Droplet Control Based on Pinning and Substrate Wettability
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Pinning of liquid droplets on solid substrates is ubiquitous and plays an essential role in many applications, especially in various areas such as microfluidics and biology. Although pinning can often reduce the efficiency of various applications, a deeper understanding of this phenomenon can actually offer possibilities for technological exploitation. Here, by means of molecular dynamics simulation, we identify the conditions that lead to droplet pinning or depinning and discuss the effects of key parameters in detail, such as the height of the physical pinning barrier and the wettability of the substrates. Moreover, we describe the mechanism of barrier crossing by the droplet upon depinning, identify the driving force of this process, and, also, elucidate the dynamics of the droplet. Not only does our work provide a detailed description of the pinning and depinning processes but also it explicitly highlights how both processes can be exploited in nanotechnology applications to control the droplet motion. Hence, we anticipate that our study will have significant implications for the nanoscale design of substrates in micro- and nanoscale systems and will assist with assessing pinning effects in various applications.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".