MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3144568485

Effective Virtual Reality Based Building Navigation Using Dynamic Loading and Path Optimization

2009· article· en· W3144568485 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Qing-Jin, Peng, Xiu-Mei, Kang, Zhao

Bibliographic record

Venue国际自动化与计算杂志 · 2009
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicRobotic Path Planning Algorithms
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsVirtual realityPath (computing)Computer scienceComputer graphics (images)Computer visionArtificial intelligence
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

尽管计算机能力显著地被改进了,一个大规模虚拟现实(VR ) 系统比当前的计算机系统能出现以存储器和计算更要求。这篇论文在造航行里讨论与 VR 性能和应用有关的二个重要问题。这些是动态的基于路径为容易的航行计划为最佳的 VR 操作,和线路优化基于房间分割模型装载。工程和在 Manitoba 的大学造的信息技术建筑群(EITC ) 的 VR 模型作为一个例子被造显示出建议方法的可行性。现实,提高了由三维(3D ) 即时交流和可视化,领先导航者进虚拟大楼沉浸的一个状态。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.018
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.270 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2009
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue国际自动化与计算杂志Same topicRobotic Path Planning AlgorithmsFrench-language works237,207