MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort

Dealing with “too much data”: Automated Structure-from-Motion Processing of Time Lapse Imagery at Nùłàdäy Glacier, Yukon, Canada

2020· article· en· W3144580882 on OpenAlexaffabout
Eleanor A. Bash, Christine F. Dow, Gregory J. McDermid

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicCryospheric studies and observations
Canadian institutionsUniversity of WaterlooUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGlacierArtificial intelligenceComputer visionBundle adjustmentPoint cloudComputer scienceGlobal Positioning SystemGeodesyComputer graphics (images)PhotogrammetryRemote sensingGeologyTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Recent advances in camera sensors, data storage, and structure-from-motion (SfM) processing are opening new possibilities for monitoring glacier processes through time series imagery. With SfM processing, internal and external camera parameters can be estimated in a bundle adjustment, alleviating problems associated with camera stability in the field. Orienting points in real world coordinates, however, still requires manual intervention in the form of ground control identification in imagery when dealing with two camera systems. We are introducing a new automated method of orienting point clouds from two-camera time lapse set ups to allow for fast processing of large numbers of frames. We accomplish this by leveraging several algorithms developed for computer vision and apply them to an analysis of glacier surface elevation change. Two time lapse systems were installed overlooking Nùłàdäy (Lowell Glacier), Yukon, Canada, on July 13, 2019. Each system consisted of a Nikon D5600 and a DigiSnap Pro, recording images at 2-hour intervals. On July 1, 2019 a manned aircraft flight collected imagery of the glacier using a Nikon D850 with a differential GPS collecting high precision locations for each image. The July 1 imagery was processed using Agisoft Photoscan Professional through the Python API to produce a target point cloud for orientation of unregistered time lapse imagery. Using Photoscan Professional’s 4D capability, a time series of images from each time lapse camera were aligned in a one-step bundle adjustment to produce a series of dense point clouds at each time step. Point clouds from time lapse imagery were coregistered to the target point cloud using a Fast Point Feature Histograms and a color-enhanced point cloud alignment based on Rusu et al. (2009) and Park et al. (2017). The M3C2 algorithm (Lague et al., 2013) was used to difference point clouds in the timeseries and derive a time series of elevation change at Nùłàdäy with an uncertainty of 1.5 m2. All steps in the workflow are executed through Python, allowing for easy automated execution of data processing. With streamlined processing it is possible to integrate more time steps into SfM analysis of glacier surface elevation change and integrate the data into modelling efforts of glacier evolution.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.684
Threshold uncertainty score0.628

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0510.019

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicCryospheric studies and observations→French-language works237,207→