Bibliographic record
Abstract
Hypertension in Pregnancy Publication details, including instructions for authors and subscription information: http://www.informaworld.com/smpp/title~content=t713597255 Women's Views of Their Experiences in the CHIPS (Control of Hypertension in Pregnancy Study) Pilot Trial L. A. Magee abcde; P. von Dadelszen bcd; S. Chan e; A. Gafni f; A. Gruslin g; M. Helewa h; S. Hewson e; E. Kavuma e; S. K. Lee i; A. G. Logan j; D. McKay e; J. -M. Moutquin k; A. Ohlsson elmno; E. Rey p; S. Ross eq; J. Singer ad; A. R. Willan nr; M. E. Hannah eos; for the CHIPS Pilot Trial Collaborative Group a Department of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada b Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada c Centre for Healthcare Innovation and Improvement, Child and Family Research Institute, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada d Department of Health Care and Epidemiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada e Women's College Research Institute, Women's College Hospital, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada f Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada g Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada h Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada i Department of Paediatrics, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada j Department of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada k Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada l Department of Paediatrics, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada m Department of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada n Programme in Population Health Science, SickKids Research Institute, Toronto, Ontario, Canada o Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada p Department of Medicine and Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada q Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada r Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada s Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.065 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".