MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3144699814

The Politics of Migration: Managing Opportunity, Conflict and Change

2003· book· en· W3144699814 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Spencer Spencer

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typebook
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Refugees, and Integration
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPoliticsImmigrationParliamentMulticulturalismPolitical scienceCitizenshipRefugeePublic administrationEuropean unionImmigration policyRhetoricPublic opinionEconomic historyLawHistoryTheology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

1. Introduction: Sarah Spencer (Institute of Public Policy Research). 2. Migration to Europe Since 1945: Its History and its Lessons: Randall Hansen (University of Oxford). 3. Managing Rapid and Deep Change in the Newest Age of Migration: Demetrios G. Papademetriou (Migration Policy Institute, Washington DC). 4. The Economic Impact of Labour Migration: Mark Kleinman (University of Bristol). 5. Refugees and the Global Politics of Asylum: Jeff Crisp (Head of the Evaluation and policy Analysis Unit at the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees). 6. The Closing of the European Gates? The New Populist Parties of Europe: John Lloyd (Financial Times). 7. Muslims and the Politics of Difference: Tariq Modood (University of Bristol). 8. The Politics of European Union Migration Policy: Claude Moraes MEP (Member of the European Parliament). 9. The Politics of US Immigration Reform: Susan Martin (Georgetown University). 10. Migration and the Welfare State in Europe: Andrew Geddes (University of Liverpool). 11. Understanding Anti--Asylum Rhetoric: Restrictive Politics or Racist Publics?: Paul Statham (University of Leeds). 12. Immigration and the Politics of Public Opinion: Shamit Saggar (Yale University). 13. Immigration, Citizenship, Multiculturalism: Exploring the Links: Will Kymlicka (Queen's University, Kingston, Ontario).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.030
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.006
Scholarly communication0.0090.007
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.078
GPT teacher head0.320
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations65
Published2003
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMigration, Refugees, and IntegrationFrench-language works237,207