Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
New correlations between various CPTU factors, undrained shear strength and overconsolidation ratio have been developed for soft to medium stiff clays. The correlations are based on comparing the CPTU results against undrained traxial compression strength and preconsolidation pressure determined on block samples of very high quality taken with the Sherbrooke 250 mm block sampler. The data base covers samples from 17 different sites ranging from soft to medium stiff clays with plasticity index from 10 to 50 % and sensitivity from 3 to about 200. The data clearly show that the measured excess pore pressure gives the best and most consistent correlation to the measured undrained strength. The cone resistance shows fairly large scatter, which may partly be an equipment/measurement problem and partly reflect that the cone resistance is a more complex parameter than the pore pressure response and which depends on more subtle clay characteristics. The cone factors also depend on the clay sensitivity and the plasticity index of the clays tested and the type of cone used.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it