MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3144924060 · doi:10.1364/oe.423103

Recurrent neural networks achieving MLSE performance for optical channel equalization

2021· article· en· W3144924060 on OpenAlexafffund
Sai-Chandra-Kumari Kalla, Christian Gagné, Ming Zeng, Leslie A. Rusch

Bibliographic record

VenueOptics Express · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicOptical Network Technologies
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsComputer scienceIntersymbol interferenceChannel (broadcasting)Bit error rateEqualization (audio)Phase-shift keyingTransmission (telecommunications)Artificial neural networkTransmitterModulation (music)Feed forwardEstimatorElectronic engineeringTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligencePhysicsMathematicsEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We explore recurrent and feedforward neural networks to mitigate severe inter-symbol interference (ISI) caused by bandlimited channels, such as high speed optical communications systems pushing the frequency response of transmitter components. We propose a novel deep bidirectional long short-term memory (BiLSTM) architecture that strongly emphasizes dependencies in data sequences. For the first time, we demonstrate via simulation that for QPSK transmission the deep BiLSTM achieves the optimal bit error rate performance of a maximum likelihood sequence estimator (MLSE) with perfect channel knowledge. We assess performance for a variety of channels exhibiting ISI, including an optical channel at 100 Gbaud operation using a 35 GHz silicon photonic (SiP) modulator. We show how the neural network performance deteriorates with increasing modulation order and ISI severity. While no longer achieving MLSE performance, the deep BiLSTM greatly outperforms linear equalization in these cases. More importantly, the neural network requires no channel state information, while its performance is comparable to conventional equalizers with perfect channel knowledge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.003

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.242
Teacher spread0.221 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueOptics ExpressSame topicOptical Network TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207