MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3145043976 · doi:10.18162/fp.2021.568

Le mémoire des CPE en master MEEF : un dispositif révélateur des ambitions et des limites de la mise en oeuvre des réformes de la formation des professionnels de l’éducation (1990-2018)

2021· article· fr· W3145043976 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Guy Lapostolle

Bibliographic record

VenueFormation et profession · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicEducation, sociology, and vocational training
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPhilosophyHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Le mmoire des CPE en master MEEF : un dispositif rvlateur des ambitions et des limites de la mise en oeuvre des rformes de la formation des professionnels de l'ducation (1990-2018) Formation et profession 28(2), 2020 1 sum Cet article rend compte d'une tude de cas portant sur le mmoire que les CPE doivent soutenir lors de leur seconde anne de master MEEF. Ce mmoire est emblmatique de l'ambition des rformes qui se sont succd de 1990 2013, qui se donnaient pour but d' universitariser et de professionnaliser la formation de ces professionnels de l' ducation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.014
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.041
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.081
Threshold uncertainty score0.161

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0140.041
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0070.005
Scholarly communication0.0070.010
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0020.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.145
GPT teacher head0.438
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueFormation et professionSame topicEducation, sociology, and vocational trainingFrench-language works237,207