MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3145096650 · doi:10.82308/20299

Laboratory investigation into soundless chemical demolition agents for rock breakage in underground mines

2019· article· en· W3145096650 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueeScholarship@McGill (McGill) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicGeomechanics and Mining Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcGill University
KeywordsDemolitionBreakageMining engineeringGeologyUnderground mining (soft rock)Forensic engineeringEngineeringWaste managementCoal miningCivil engineeringComputer scienceCoal

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The method of drilling and blasting with explosives is widely used in the mining industry for mine development and ore production. However, the use of explosives is associated with rigorous safety and environmental constraints as blasting creates toxic fumes, ground vibrations and dust. The following study is conducted on Soundless, Explosive-Free Chemical Demolition Agents (SCDAs), a more environmentally friendly method for the fragmentation of rock as a potential replacement of explosives. SCDAs are powdery materials similar to Portland cement, which when mixed as a slurry and poured into blind drilled holes, an expansive pressure is produced upon curing and eventually breaks the material apart. Given that SCDAs are commercially available, there is proof of workability in civil engineering applications for the breakage of concrete foundations. SCDAs are commonly used in the demolition of concrete foundations as well as in stone quarries where the use of explosives is either restricted or prohibited. An interest is drawn towards SCDAs due to its environmental advantages which mitigate the risk of explosives. This study is a step in investigating its workability in hard rock mine development and production where the rock is subjected to high in-situ confinement pressure which would make rock breakage cumbersome. A drawback of the SCDAs is that the time needed to develop the full expansive pressure is too long for practical mine development applications. The primary goal of the study is to accelerate the expansion rate of SCDAs as one of the steps towards development of a feasible method of rock breakage in underground mines. The SCDA used in this investigation is Betonamit, a commercially available expansive cement. The experimental investigation was conducted in the Rockbolting Lab of the Mine Design Laboratory. This study is an extension of the work previously conducted by Musunnuri & Mitri (2009) and Dessouki & Mitri (2011) in the Mine Design Laboratory of McGill University.The factors investigated are: the expansive pressure, expansive pressure rate, and fractural growth on concrete blocks. The effect of chemical additives on expansive pressure is investigated with the goal to reduce the time of expansion. Common concrete accelerators including calcium chloride, sodium chloride, calcium formate, and sodium were investigated.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.148
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.011
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it