Improving cache locality for thread-level speculation
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
With the advent of chip-multiprocessors (CMPs), thread-level speculation (TLS) remains a promising technique for exploiting this highly multithreaded hardware to improve the performance of an individual program. However, with such speculatively-parallel execution the cache locality once enjoyed by the original uniprocessor execution is significantly disrupted: for TLS execution on a four-processor CMP, we find that the data-cache miss rates are nearly four-times those of the uniprocessor case, even though TLS execution utilizes four private data caches (i.e., four-fold greater cache capacity). We break down the TLS cache locality problem into instruction and data cache, execution stages, and parallel access patterns, and propose methods to improve cache locality in each of these areas. We find that for parallel regions across 13 SPECint applications our simple and low-cost techniques reduce data-cache misses by 38%, improve performance by 12.8%, and significantly improve scalability - further enhancing the feasibility of TLS as a way to capitalize on future CMPs.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it