MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3145230667 · doi:10.5194/egusphere-egu21-12666

Long-term temporal structure analysis of sediment fluxes in the Upper Changjiang (Yangtze River) using a wavelet transformation

2021· article· en· W3145230667 on OpenAlexaff
N. Garijo, Carmelo Juez, Marwan A. Hassan, Estela Nadal‐Romero

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSedimentWaveletYangtze riverTransformation (genetics)Series (stratigraphy)Flow (mathematics)Environmental scienceTerm (time)GeologyTemporal scalesDischargeHydrology (agriculture)ChinaGeomorphologyMathematicsGeographyGeotechnical engineeringDrainage basinComputer scienceEcologyGeometryPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Temporal fluctuations of suspended sediment fluxes are highly related with the flow and sediment regime of river networks. Flow dynamics are mainly triggered by climatic forces. Conversely, sediment regime is majorly controlled by land cover/land use changes and by human infrastructures (e.g. dams). Resulting sediment fluxes thus show a non-linear and non-stationary nature. The wavelet transformation technique emerges as a skilful tool capable of dealing with this type of data. It allows to distinguish within the full spectrum of time-scales, those which are dominant and thus govern the overall trend of the time-series. Furthermore, the temporal multiresolution wavelet technique allows to accurately denoise the discharge and SSC time-series, filtering out the high frequency intermittent physical processes which are superimposed on the main signal. In this research, we analyse a long-term dataset of discharge and sediment fluxes time-series for the Upper Changjiang (Yangtze River, China).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.026
Threshold uncertainty score0.052

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.230 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicHydrology and Sediment Transport Processes→French-language works237,207→