MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

0088 Bidirectional association between daily physical activity and postconcussion symptoms among youth

2021· article· en· W3145250091 on OpenAlex
Jingzhen Yang, Menglin Xu, Lindsay Sullivan, H. Gerry Taylor, Keith Owen Yeates

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueAbstracts · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicTraumatic Brain Injury Research
Canadian institutionsAlberta Children's HospitalUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConcussionAssociation (psychology)Physical activityPsychologyPhysical therapyMedicinePoison controlInjury preventionEnvironmental health

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Statement of purpose We investigated the longitudinal and bidirectional association between daily physical activity and postconcussion symptoms (PCS) among concussed youth aged 11–17 years. Methods/Approach We prospectively enrolled youth aged 11–17 years with a physician-confirmed concussion within 72 hours of injury. We measured daily physical activity using an ActiGraph and daily PCS using the Postconcussion Symptom Scale from day 1 to day 7 postinjury. We grouped daily step count and PCS into three waves: days 1–3 (Wave 1), days 4–5 (Wave 2), and days 6–7 (Wave 3) postinjury. We examined the bidirectional associations between daily step counts and PCS in the 3-wave, longitudinal design using both a traditional cross-lagged panel model (CLPM) and a random-intercept cross-lagged panel model (RI-CLPM). Results Participants included 83 concussed youth (54 boys [65%]; mean age 14.2 years; 59 White participants [72%]; and 70 sports-related concussions [84%]). The mean daily step counts were 9,167 at Wave 1, 10,143 at Wave 2, and 10,786 at Wave 3, while the mean daily PCS scores were 27.7, 21.0, and 15.9. In the CLPM, daily step counts and PCS scores showed significant positive autoregressive associations across all waves. In contrast, in the RI-CLPM, the only significant autoregressive association was the path for PCS scores from Wave 1 to Wave 2 (p=.002). In the CLPM, only one cross-lagged path was significant, with higher PCS scores at Wave 1 being associated with lower daily step counts at Wave 2 (p=.047). No cross-lagged paths were significant in the RI- CLPM. Conclusion While youth who engaged in more physical activity reported fewer PCS, only one cross- lagged association was significant. Future randomized controlled trials are needed to better understand the effects of physical activity on PCS. Significance This study is the first to assess the bidirectional association between physical activity and PCS using cross-lagged panel analyses.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.052
Threshold uncertainty score0.407

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.044
GPT teacher head0.326
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it