Polygamy's rights and wrongs : perspectives on harm, family, and law
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Introduction: Is Polygamy Inherently Harmful? / Lori G. Beaman 1 Plus Ca Change ... ? Bountiful's Diverse and Durable Marriage Practices / Angela Campbell 2 How Should Public Institutions Assess Religious Identity? The Case of Polygamy / Avigail Eisenberg 3 Polygamy and the Predicament of Contemporary Criminal Law / Benjamin L. Berger 4 Are They Not Us? A Personal Reflection on Polygamy / Arta Blanche Johnson 5 Reflecting on Polygamy: What's the Harm? / Rebecca Johnson 6 Polygamy in the Parisian Banlieues: Debate and Discourse on the 2005 French Suburban Riots / Jennifer A. Selby 7 Polygamy and Race-Thinking: A Genealogy / Margaret Denike 8 Making Them Fit: The Australian National Census and Aboriginal Family Forms / Frances Morphy 9 The Raids at Short Creek and Yearning for Zion Ranch and the Law of Unintended Consequences / Martha Bradley-Evans Conclusion: To the Exclusion of All Others - Polygamy, Monogamy, and the Legal Family in Canada / Gillian Calder Bibliography Index
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it