MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3145309539 · doi:10.1039/d1ce00131k

Laser damage mechanism and <i>in situ</i> observation of stacking fault relaxation in a β-Ga<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> single crystal by the EFG method

2021· article· en· W3145309539 on OpenAlexaff
Bo Fu, Gaohang He, Wenxiang Mu, Yang Li, Boyuan Feng, Kaihui Zhang, Huanyang Wang, Jin Zhang, Shaojun Zhang, Zhitai Jia, Yujun Shi, Yanbin Li, Sunan Ding, Xutang Tao

Bibliographic record

VenueCrystEngComm · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicGa2O3 and related materials
Canadian institutionsCalgary Laboratory ServicesUniversity of Calgary
FundersSpecial Project for Research and Development in Key areas of Guangdong ProvinceInternational Science and Technology Cooperation Program of Jiangsu ProvinceNational Key Research and Development Program of ChinaHigher Education Discipline Innovation ProjectKey Technology Research and Development Program of ShandongNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsStacking faultIn situStackingRelaxation (psychology)Materials scienceLaserSingle crystalCrystal (programming language)Mechanism (biology)Fault (geology)CrystallographyChemistryOpticsComputer sciencePhysicsNuclear magnetic resonanceGeologyPsychology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We for the first time built up a laser damage mechanism and <italic>in situ</italic> observed stacking fault relaxation in a β-Ga <sub>2</sub> O <sub>3</sub> single crystal.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.239
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations6
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCrystEngCommSame topicGa2O3 and related materialsFrench-language works237,207