Inferior Vena Cava Filter Thrombosis in Protein-S Deficiency Patient due to Withdrawal of Anticoagulation Therapy After operation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In protein S deficiency, if there was recurrent thrombotic event, ongoing anti-coagulation therapy should be administered. Especially, in case of life threatening recurrent pulmonary embolism, prophylactic inferior vena cava (IVC) filter with anti-coagulation therapy may be considered. But until now, there is no definite guideline for anti-coagulation therapy duration about recurrent thrombotic events in protein S deficiency patients. A 64-year old male patient who already was diagnosed with protein S deficiency accompanied with recurrent pulmonary embolism and was performed IVC filter was referred to our hospital due to manage both leg edema after operation. In the abdominal CT, we could find IVC filter thrombosis occurred to withdrawal anti-coagulation therapy for 2 weeks after spine operation. So we performed catheter-based procedure with anti-coagulation therapy and successfully treated IVC filter thrombosis. J Med Cases. 2013;4(9):612-615 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/jmc1417w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".