PELATIHAN MENJAHIT DALAM MENINGKATKAN JIWA KEWIRAUSAHAAN PEREMPUAN DI PUSAT KEGIATAN BELAJAR MASAYARAKAT (PKBM) TIARA DEZZY SAMARINDA
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pelaksanaan pelatihan menjahit di PKBM Tiara Dezzy Samarinda. Yang di tinjau dari perencanaan, pelaksanaan, evaluasi, tindak lanjut dan hambatan-hambatan dalam pelatihan menjahit ini. Penelitian ini merupakan Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian kualitatif, yaitu metode penelitian yang berlandaskan pada filsafat postpositivisme, digunakan untuk meneliti pada kondisi objek yang alamiah. Subjek penelitian ini adalah perempuan yang tidak bekerja dan yang sedang menyiapkan diri untuk bekerja tetapi tidak memiliki keterampilan. Hasil penelitian menunjukan bahwa : (1). Perencanaan pelatihan dilaksanakan tetapi masih belum maksimal karena tidak melibatkan seluruh elemen pelatihan. (2). Pelaksanaan menjahit telah dilaksanakan dengan maksimal. (3). Evaluasi meliputi evaluasi tutor dan evalasi warga belajar. (4). PKBM Tiara Dezzy memberikan pengawasan dan juga membuka usaha bersama bagi warga belajar yang telah menyelesaikan pelatihan. (5). Hambatan-hambatan pelatihan seperti tenaga tutor yang kurangdan sarana dan prasarana yang kurang.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.026 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".