THEORETICAL AND PRACTICAL ASPECTS OF THE DEVELOPMENT OF EMOTIONAL AND MORAL CULTURE IN ELDER PRESCHOOL CHILDREN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In modern society, priority is given to the cognitive development of children and, as a rule, there is no practical implementation of purposeful work in the field of emotional and moral development of preschoolers. Consequently, the integral, harmonious development of the personality is disturbed. Obviously, in the modern social and cultural environment, a purposeful approach to the emotional and moral development of the younger generation is required. The emergence in science of relatively new concepts of "emotional and moral education (ENV)" and the associated "emotional and moral development (ENR)" (OV Girfanova, VV Zaboltina, NA Kornienko, etc.) is able to find ways to optimize traditional moral education and development. These categories are associated with the actualization of the child's need for empathy and are based on a closer connection between the emotional and cognitive components. In the period of preschool childhood (sensitive 5-6 years), the foundation of emotional and moral development is laid: moral consciousness (knowledge of norms and values); emotional assessment (moral emotions and feelings); internal position of the child (moral self-regulation and behavior). This work concretizes the concept of "emotional and moral development" (EMD). Emotional and moral development is a pedagogically controlled process that is inextricably linked with the personal development of children in general, their socialization, the introduction into the world of culture - the culture of world perception, self-expression. The article actualizes the problem of professional competence of future teachers of preschool educational organizations in the field of development of emotional and moral culture in older preschool children. The adult's role as an escort is very important and responsible. The future of the child as an empathic personality or non-empathic personality depends on the educational influence of adults, on what qualities will be formed. The conducted research is aimed at an attempt to solve important problems of vocational education.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.009 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".