Task Allocation Framework For Software-Defined Fog v-RAN
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fifth-generation wireless technology (5G) has been developed with an aim to provide ubiquitous and scalable connectivity for Internet-of-Things (IoT) nodes. Likewise, the cloud radio access network (C-RAN) architecture can be exploited to enable efficient network access to IoT nodes. Nevertheless, the 5G C-RAN architecture is based on large data centers geographically located far apart, which introduces an inevitable overhead. Therefore, to supply real-time data services near by the data terminals, fog computing emerges as a promising solution. However, constrained physical fog resources and delay-sensitive services hinder the application of new virtualization technologies in the baseband unit (BBU) task allocation management of the fog network. To tackle these challenges, a task allocation framework for hierarchical software-defined fog virtual radio access networks (v-RANs) is proposed in this article. Precisely, we apply an enhanced ant colony optimization (ACO) in combination with a max-min algorithm to efficiently determine the optimal path for BBU task allocation management, while minimizing the transmission time for parallel task execution scheduling. Experimental results demonstrate that the queue delay in our approach is 98.38% and 98.82% lower than the round-robin (RR) algorithm and least connection technique (LCT), respectively.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".