Pseudo-Zero Velocity Re-Detection Double Threshold Zero-Velocity Update (ZUPT) for Inertial Sensor-Based Pedestrian Navigation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Zero-velocity update method (ZUPT) is widely used in inertial measurement unit (IMU)-based pedestrian navigation systems for mitigating sensor drifting error. In the basic pedestrian dead reckoning (PDR) system, especially in the foot-tie PDR system, zero-velocity update method with Kalman filter are two core algorithms. In the basic PDR system, ZUPT usually uses a single threshold to judge the gait of pedestrians. A single threshold, however, makes ZUPT unable to accurately judge the gait of pedestrians in different road conditions. In this paper, we propose a new, redesigned ZUPT method without using additional equipment and filter algorithms to further improve the accuracy of correction results. The method uses a sliding detection algorithm to help re-detect the zero-velocity intervals, aiming to remove the pseudo-zero velocity interval and the pseudo-motion interval, as well as improving the performance of the ZUPT method. The method was implemented in a shoe-mounted IMU-based navigation system. For walking step detection tests, the accuracy of the proposed modified ZUPT method reached 87.24%, 25% higher than the conventional methods. In a long-distance walking path tracking test, the mean error of the estimated path of our method is 0.61 m, an 81.69% reduction compared to the conventional ZUPT methods. The details of the improved ZUPT method presented in this paper not only enable the tracking technology to better track a pedestrian’s step changes during walking, but also provide better calculation conditions for subsequent filter operations.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".