MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3145459925

The Design of Simple Experiment System for Automatic Control Theory

2011· article· en· W3145459925 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Xi Chen

Bibliographic record

VenueMicrocomputer applications · 2011
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicExperimental Learning in Engineering
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceOscilloscopeComputer hardwareModular designMicrocontrollerSoftwareController (irrigation)Data acquisitionEmbedded systemSimple (philosophy)Control systemGenerator (circuit theory)Software designPower (physics)Software developmentElectrical engineeringOperating system
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

For the shortcomings high prices and operation complexity of traditional university laboratory experiment platform for automatic control principle,the paper designs a simple experimental system of cheap and easy to operate.The system is divided into two parts of hardware and software.The hardware part adopts modular design concept,mainly including power module,signal generator module,basic experimental link module,control system module and the data acquisition module.The module of control system uses dual microcontroller of AT89S52 ATmega16 and as a controller,and facilitates data collection,processing and display.The software part adopts the development platform of LabVIEW to produce a virtual oscilloscope,and the virtual oscilloscope has a good interactive feature,as well as to monitor the experimental waveforms and subsequent processing.After the completion of the entire system design,the system is carried out an experiment through the step response for typical second-order oscillation link,and the experimental result is consistent entirely with the theoretical analysis.The experiment result has proved the simple experiment system can replace the traditional experimental platform for automatic control principle,and the system has the advantages of cheap and easy to operate,also has high promotional value in colleges and universities.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.731
Threshold uncertainty score0.377

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.201 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2011
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMicrocomputer applicationsSame topicExperimental Learning in EngineeringFrench-language works237,207