Icing Load and Risk Forecasting for Power Transmission Line Based on Multi-scale Time Series Phase-Space Reconstruction and Regression
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Accurately forecasting the icing load on overhead power transmission lines is an important issue to ensure the security and reliability of the power grid. A multi-scale time series phase-space reconstruction and regression model for icing load prediction is proposed in this paper to treat the non-stationary, nonlinear, and intermittent volatility of power line icing load data. Those is motivated by the traditional icing load prediction models having many disadvantages in the forecasting accuracy, as well as the casualness of the parameters selected. Firstly, the icing load data are decomposed into a multi-scale time series of intrinsic model function (IMF) components with stability by using the ensemble empirical mode decomposition (EEMD), which can reduce the interactions between different types of feature information. Secondly, phase-space reconstruction (PSR) theory is applied using the mutual information and the false nearest neighbor to determine the optimal delay time and embedding dimension of each IMF component. Thirdly, considering the characteristics of each IMF component, different kernel functions and optimization parameters are selected to establish the prediction model based support vector regression (SVR). Finally, according to the load prediction results, fuzzy reasoning method was used to determine the risk status of transmission line towers in this paper. Upon experimentally evaluating the validity of the model using related transmission lines of the Yunnan Power Grid, it is shown that this method could predict the real-time icing load on overhead power lines, obtaining better regression performance. This model could be used on power transmission and distribution systems for deicing and maintenance decisions.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".