WEST NILE VIRUS SEROCONVERSION IN EASTERN LOGGERHEAD SHRIKE ( LANIUS LUDOVICIANUS MIGRANS) AFTER VACCINATION WITH A KILLED VACCINE
Bibliographic record
Abstract
) is a migratory songbird that has undergone massive population declines in Ontario since the 1950s. As part of a broad strategy of recovery, a captive breeding population was established in the late 1990s. This species appears to be extremely sensitive to West Nile virus (WNV) infection, with prior outbreaks at Ontario breeding facilities reaching a 100% mortality rate. This study aimed to investigate the humoral response to vaccination in juvenile birds given single versus serial booster vaccinations, as well as to assess the duration of protective virus-neutralizing titers in annually vaccinated adult birds, by measuring WNV-neutralizing antibodies via the Plaque Reduction Neutralization Test. Twenty-two adult birds and forty 18-22-day-old chicks were included in the study. Annual vaccination resulted in serum neutralizing antibody against WNV for only 59% of adult individuals 1 yr following vaccination. These results, coupled with the death of one vaccinated adult individual due to WNV infection, suggest that a second booster vaccination may be required to adequately protect adult individuals throughout the WNV transmission season. The results of the trial involving juvenile birds indicate that vaccination does not effectively stimulate the immune system of naïve juveniles to produce serum-neutralizing antibodies against WNV in the majority of tested birds, although serial booster vaccination appears to provide a level of improved seroconversion. However, the loss of 19% of naïve juveniles to natural WNV infection versus a less than 3% loss of juveniles that received at least one vaccination suggests some level of cell-mediated immunity and protection against infection takes place in juvenile birds postvaccination. The deaths of several nonvaccinated juveniles and one vaccinated adult at this study facility suggest that WNV continues to be a pathogen of high risk in this species in captivity, and likely in the wild as well.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".