Wideband Antennas Using Coaxial Waveguide
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Waveguide arrays comprise slot radiators cut into hollow, single-mode, standing wave structures. Their impedance bandwidth and compactness are limited by the waveguide cutoff. By using the TEM mode of a coaxial waveguide, a more compact structure with a larger bandwidth is possible at the expense of increased ohmic loss in the waveguide. Using this basis, a new type of slotted coaxial waveguide antenna is presented. A compact waveguide array means that the element and array aspects are not independent, and with no accurate transmission line models for the structure, the design is from a parametric study by simulation. Two basic designs are demonstrated: the first with no constraint on the azimuthal extent of the slots, and the second where some mechanical strength of the waveguide is maintained by constraining the azimuthal extent of the slots to be 90° or less. The parametric studies provide insight for realizing the high bandwidth, and measurements of prototypes confirm the performance. These antennas are useful for integration with cylindrical structures such as masts or bicycle and drone frames.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".