MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3145609083

An Exploration of Moral Distress Among Nurse Managers In Long Term Care Facilities

2020· dissertation· en· W3145609083 on OpenAlexaff

Bibliographic record

VenueTSpace · 2020
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of SaskatchewanSt. Michael's Hospital
FundersChina Aerospace Science and Technology Corporation
KeywordsTerm (time)NursingDistressPsychologyLong-term careMedicineBusinessPsychotherapist
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Moral distress is defined as the suffering experienced as a result of situations in which individuals are aware of a moral problem, acknowledge moral responsibility, and make a moral judgment about the correct action to take, yet due to constraints (real or perceived) cannot carry out this action. Thus they believe that they are committing a moral offence by compromising their personal and professional values. The suffering may present as feelings of anger, frustration, guilt and/or powerlessness associated with a decreased sense of well-being. The purpose of this research was to explore the experience and impact of moral distress on Nurse Managers working in long-term care (LTC) organizations. And at the same time to explore the ethical climate within those organizations to discern whether to facilitate or impede the resolution of moral distress. Few studies have explored moral distress in both the Nurse Manager and LTC context. Using a case study research method, the respondents in this study described in detail their experiences of moral distress, the circumstances in which they occurred, and the deleterious effects on their physical, emotional, social, psychological, and spiritual well-being. Among the findings in this study, there were some correlations between the positive ethical climate found in a healthy workplace and lower levels of moral distress, and the power that positive relationships exert in coping with moral distress during and after the situation. There were several coping mechanisms Nurse Managers identified as helpful in dealing with moral distress. However, when the intensity of moral distress reached unbearable levels, and the coping mechanisms seemed to no longer suffice, Nurse Managers would leave their position or their organization. This study also asked participants to consider what advice they would give to new Nurse Managers, the organization’s leaders and the healthcare system as a whole in order to address the issue of moral distress. The respondents identified a number of helpful or potentially helpful recommendations to support new managers, which may aid in developing organizational strategies that could support the wellbeing of Nurse Managers, today and into the future, and may help to reduce staff attrition and burnout.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.011
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.028

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.011
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0070.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.002
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.315
Teacher spread0.272 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTSpace→Same topicHermeneutics and Narrative Identity→French-language works237,207→