MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3145616945 · doi:10.1109/07ias.2007.281

Development and Implementation of a New Adaptive Intelligent Speed Controller for IPMSM Drive

2007· article· en· W3145616945 on OpenAlexaff
M. Muminul Islam Chy, M. Nasir Uddin

Bibliographic record

VenueConference record · 2007
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSensorless Control of Electric Motors
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAdaptive neuro fuzzy inference systemComputer scienceControl theory (sociology)Control engineeringElectronic speed controlController (irrigation)Fuzzy control systemMachine controlRange (aeronautics)Fuzzy logicEngineeringControl (management)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In controlling nonlinear, time varying and ill defined systems artificial intelligent controllers have been proved to be superior in design and performance when compared to the conventional controllers. This paper presents a novel adaptive-network-based fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) for speed control of interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM) drive. By utilizing a learning technique, the proposed ANFIS can construct an input-output mapping based on both human knowledge (in the form of fuzzy if-then rules) and stipulated input-output data pairs. The back-propagation technique is used for online tuning of ANFIS parameters in order to optimize the performance of the proposed drive. The proposed control technique also provides flux control to control the motor over a wide speed range. The complete drive has been successfully implemented in real-time using digital signal processor board DS1104. The performance of the proposed ANFIS based IPMSM drive is investigated both in simulation and experiment at different operating conditions.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.004

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.038
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.244 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2007
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueConference recordSame topicSensorless Control of Electric MotorsFrench-language works237,207