MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3145810494 · doi:10.1109/tasc.2021.3071482

Performance of Ratios‐Based Transformer Differential Protection Scheme in the Presence of Resistive Superconductor Fault Current Limiter

2021· article· en· W3145810494 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Applied Superconductivity · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicPower Systems Fault Detection
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Calgary
Fundersnot available
KeywordsResistive touchscreenTransformerElectric power systemMATLABComputer scienceFault current limiterDifferential protectionLimiterElectrical engineeringPower-system protectionFault (geology)Reliability engineeringMaterials sciencePower (physics)VoltageEngineeringPhysicsTelecommunications

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

With the increased demand for electrical power, it is required to increase the number of power transformers in power systems. One of the main challenges facing protection engineers is the protection and isolation of power transformers in the shortest time possible, during internal faults. One of the alternative solutions to reduce the fault current in the power system is the application of a superconductor fault current limiter (SFCL). In this article, the ratios-based transformer differential protection algorithm is evaluated in the presence of resistive SFCL during internal fault conditions. A model of the system under study, including SFCL, is simulated and studies are performed in MATLAB/Simulink environment. The results demonstrate the capability of the ratios-based differential protection scheme to detect internal faults in the presence of SFCL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.151
Threshold uncertainty score0.980

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.028
GPT teacher head0.237
Teacher spread0.209 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it