MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3145954647 · doi:10.1017/9781139236249.008

Lectures Introductory to the Law of the Constitution

2020· book-chapter· en· W3145954647 on OpenAlexaff
Mark Walters

Bibliographic record

VenueCambridge University Press eBooks · 2020
Typebook-chapter
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal principles and applications
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsJurisprudenceConstitutionLawSalaryCivil law (Civil law)Common lawSociologyClassicsHistoryPolitical scienceCommercial law

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Albert Venn Dicey had long wished for a professorship. There were four chairs in law at Oxford at this time. He had tried for the Chichele Professorship of International Law, but it went to his friend Thomas Erskine Holland. The Regius Professorship of Civil Law was held by his friend James Bryce. That left the Corpus Professorship of Jurisprudence and the Vinerian Professorship of Common Law. As it happened, both chairs became vacant at about the same time. Sir Henry Maine resigned as Professor of Jurisprudence in late 1878 to become Master of Trinity Hall, Cambridge, and John Robert Kenyon, who had been the Vinerian Professor since 1844, died in April 1880. Long before his death, Kenyon had more or less retreated to his ‘beloved Shropshire’ and the Vinerian chair was effectively in abeyance. 1 However, the university took steps to reconstitute and revitalise the chair. At this time, the Vinerian professorship in law was attached to All Souls with an annual salary (£700) thought sufficient to attract worthy candidates, and it was renamed the Vinerian Professorship of English Law. 2

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.191
Threshold uncertainty score0.639

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1910.053

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.026
GPT teacher head0.226
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCambridge University Press eBooksSame topicLegal principles and applicationsFrench-language works237,207