Interpretive Structural Analysis of Interrelationships of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in Iran
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) provide an ambitious agenda to end poverty and its dimensions and a sustainable, prosperous, and fair future. The aim of our paper is to assess the significance of SDGs from the perspective of Iran. To this end, the method of ISM has been used to express the interrelationships between SDGs. Besides, MICMAC method was utilized to assess dependence and driving power of every SDG. By data analyzing, SDGs were classified into six different levels and were modeled according to the interrelationships between them. Variables then were divided into three groups of dependent, independent/driving, communication, and autonomous variables, and no variable was included in the group of linkage variables. The findings show that SDGs12 and SDGs4 are the most fundamental goals of sustainable development, considering the needs, development stages, capacities of Iran. Achieving them is the basis for achieving other goals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it