MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3146070667 · doi:10.1177/10778004211002759

Weaving Academic Home: Metaphor, Insurgent Culture, and Transnational Indigeneity

2021· article· en· W3146070667 on OpenAlexaff
Martha Kuwee Kumsa

Bibliographic record

VenueQualitative Inquiry · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCritical Race Theory in Education
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsWeavingMetaphorAutoethnographySociologyEthnographyAestheticsOxymoronGender studiesAnthropologyArtPhilosophyLinguistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

I use theories encoded in the metaphors and proverbs of my foremothers’ insurgent siinqee culture to tell the story of my struggles in weaving an academic home for my oxymoron transnational indigeneity. I start by positioning myself and my autoethnography. I then use basket-weaving as a metaphor to story the siinqee epistemology and methodology that guide me in the constitutive processes of making home in academia. I slip in and out of times and spaces to share with you the woven stories of my weeping basket, hurting basket, and healing basket.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: Qualitative
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0120.041
Scholarly communication0.0080.010
Open science0.0010.008
Research integrity0.0020.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.127
GPT teacher head0.501
Teacher spread0.374 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueQualitative InquirySame topicCritical Race Theory in EducationFrench-language works237,207