MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3146266057 · doi:10.5488/cmp.11.4.761

nformation and data protection within a RDBMS

2008· article· en· W3146266057 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueCondensed Matter Physics · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicAdvanced Data Storage Technologies
Canadian institutionsOkanagan College
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceEncryptionRelational database management systemComputer securitySQLDatabaseOracleRelational databaseProgramming language

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Security issues for some special large data, such as binary and image files, as well as video and audio files and streams still require a special development, especially for the industrial database systems (Oracle, MS SQL, DB2, etc). New encryption methods should be used additionally to traditional encryption methods and other protection solutions, such as authentication, authorization, access control, security monitoring and audit. The purpose of this article is to present the research results regarding information security and data protection, as well as some practical aspects of the encryption by CrypTIM algorithm, developed by Prof. V. Ustimenko in the last decade [Ustimenko V., Lecture Notes In Computer Science, 2001, 278, 2227]. This text additionally proposes a practical utilization of the Model Driven system design for large objects (LOB) encryptions within a database, used to store some special large binary files, such as images, sound files, movies, special binary files in order to improve maintenance and data protection. Novel problems and trends in providing security against criminal activities in the current Cyberspace are analyzed.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.857
Threshold uncertainty score0.385

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.063
GPT teacher head0.264
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it