MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3146334928

The basic principle of random forest and its applications in ecology: a case study of Pinus yunnanensis

2014· article· en· W3146334928 on OpenAlexaff
Le Zhang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicForest ecology and management
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRandom forestOverfittingOutlierEnsemble learningCategorical variableDecision treeCluster analysisMachine learningArtificial intelligenceComputer scienceMissing dataRegressionRegression analysisStatisticsMathematicsData miningArtificial neural network
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Ecological data are often complex. The explanatory and the response variables may be categorical variables or numerical variables. The ecological relationships that need to be defined are often nonlinear and involve high-order interactions between explanatory variables. Missing values for both response and predictor variables are very common,and outliers almost always exist. Random forest( RF),a novel machine learning technique,is ideally suited for the analysis ofcomplex ecological data. RF predictors are a ensemble-learning approach based on regression or classification trees. Instead of building one classification tree( classifier),the RF algorithm builds multiple classifiers using randomly selected subsets of the observations and random subsets of the predictor variables. The predictions from the ensemble of trees are then averaged in the case of regression trees,or tallied using a voting system for classification trees. RF is efficient to support flexible modelling strategies. RF is capable of detecting and making use of more complex relationships among the variables. RF is unexcelled in accuracy among current algorithms and does not overfit. It also generates an internal unbiased estimate of the generalization error as the forest building progresses. Potential applications of RF to ecology include: classification and regression analysis,survival analysis,variable importance estimate and data proximities. Proximities can be used for clustering,detecting outliers,multi-dimensional scaling,and unsupervised classification. RF can interpolate missing value and maintain high accuracy even when a large proportion of the data are missing. RF can handle thousands of input variables without variable exclusion. It runs efficiently on large data bases. RF can also handle a spectrum of response types, including categorical,numeric,ratings,and survival data. Another advantage of the RF is that it requires only two userdefined parameters( The number of trees and the number of randomly selected predictive variables used to split the nodes) to be defined. These two parameters should be optimized in order to improve predictive accuracy. In recent years,RF has been widely used by ecologists to model complex ecological relationships because they are easy to implement and easy to interpret. To understand and use the RF,further information about how they are computed is useful. Here,we summarized the basic principle of RF and showed how RF handle complex data by modelling the geographical distribution of Yunan Pine( Pinus yunnanensis) in China. RF is a robust and widely used technique in the field of species distribution modelling( SDM),since it meets the basic needs of SDM: simulating species distribution and identifying the main drivers of species distribution. In this work,RF showed a high predictive performance in simulating the distribution of Yunan Pine,which was consistent with the multi-dimensional scaling plot that showed it was possible to separate the presences from the absences. We also estimated the relative importance of predictor variables and produced the partial dependence plots for selected predictor variables for random forest predictions of the presences of Yunan Pine. The main aim of the article is to familiarize the reader with the general concepts,terminology and basic principle behind RF. We believe RF will get more applications and development in ecology.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: Methods
Teacher disagreement score0.010
Threshold uncertainty score0.020

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.234
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations37
Published2014
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicForest ecology and managementFrench-language works237,207