MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3146380147

The ldentification and Cloning of Human Ubiquitin Binding Enzyme cDNA

2000· article· en· W3146380147 on OpenAlexaff
Liang Hong-yan

Bibliographic record

VenueZhongguo Yixue Kexueyuan xuebao · 2000
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicWeb Data Mining and Analysis
Canadian institutionsCAE (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComplementary DNAcDNA libraryBiologyNorthern blotMolecular biologyUbiquitinUbiquitin-conjugating enzymeGenePeptide sequenceExonEnzymeIsozymeBiochemistryUbiquitin ligase
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Objective To identify and clone the gene encoding human ubiquitin binding enzyme and study its expression spectrum. Methods According to the sequence of human EST,which is highly homologous to the mouse ubiquitin conjugating enzyme(E2),primers used for library screening were synthesized to screen the human fetal brain cDNA library.The gene was analyzed by making use of bioinformatics and its expression spectrum was studied by using multiple tissue Northern blot. Results Two cDNA clones encoding human ubiquitin conjugating enzyme were isolated and identified.Both containing the ubiquitin conjugating domain,they were 88% identical in amino acid sequences and found to be isoforms of each other with only an exon excised from the short sequence.They belonged to a highly conserved,and widely expressed E2 enzyme family. Northern blot showed that they were expressed exclusively in heart,placenta,and pancreas while no transcripts could be detected in brain,lung,liver,skeletal muscle,or kidney. Conclusions The gene encoding human ubiquitin binding enzyme is expressed under both temporal and spatial control.As a key enzyme in the degradation of proteins,ubiquitin conjugating enzymes play a central role in the expression regulation on the level of post translation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.638
Threshold uncertainty score0.604

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.250
Teacher spread0.236 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2000
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueZhongguo Yixue Kexueyuan xuebaoSame topicWeb Data Mining and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207