Tráfico de niños e identidad en "Nordeste" (2005), de Juan Solanas
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Despite the increasing popularity and applicability of metabolomics for putative biomarker identification, analysis of the data is challenged by low statistical power resulting from the small sample sizes and large numbers of metabolites and other omics information, as well as confounding demographic and clinical variables. To enhance the statistical power and improve reproducibility of the identified metabolite-based biomarkers, we advocate the use of advanced statistical methods that can simultaneously evaluate the relationship between a group of metabolites and various types of variables including other omics profiles, demographic and clinical data, as well as the complex interactions between them. Accordingly, in this chapter, we describe the method of seemingly unrelated regression that can simultaneously analyze multiple metabolites while controlling the confounding effects of demographic and clinical variables (such as gender, age, BMI, smoking status). We also introduce penalized orthogonal components regression as a screening approach that can handle millions of omics predictors in the model.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it