MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3146464560 · doi:10.1093/jbcr/irab032.207

557 Amniotic Fluid Injections in Chronic Non-Healing Wounds in Pediatric Patients: A Case Series

2021· article· en· W3146464560 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Anna M. Darelli‐Anderson, S. South, Giavonni Lewis

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Burn Care & Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular Techniques
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSurgeryWound healingRetrospective cohort studyTotal body surface areaAdverse effectSkin graftingAnesthesiaInternal medicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Amniotic tissues are used to support wound healing in a variety of fields and wound types including chronic stasis ulcers, lower extremity wounds in diabetic patients, poorly healing injuries associated with burns, and surgical wounds associated with intestinal fistulas. To date, the use of amniotic fluid (AF) alone has not been described in the literature. The properties of AF alone would suggest the potential for regenerative and accelerated healing. This descriptive, retrospective review evaluates the effects of AF injected into chronic, poorly healing burn wounds. Methods We conducted a retrospective chart review across five years and identified a total of 39 pediatric patients with chronic, poorly healing burn wounds, nine of whom were treated with AF injections. Five of these patients were excluded due to incomplete post-treatment data. All patients were managed in the ambulatory care setting. We evaluated Vancouver Burn Scar Scale (VBSS) and Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale (POSAS) scores as well as pre- and post-treatment photos of the wounds. Results Four patients aged 1–16 years met inclusion criteria with TBSA ranging from 1% to 57.5%. All patients tolerated the procedure well and none suffered adverse events associated with treatment. The average time from injury to treatment with AF was 14 months. Patient A is a 1-year-old male with bilateral posterior thigh wounds that remained open following skin grafting of a 57.5% TBSA injury who received injection of AF 5 months after injury. One month after treatment with AF injections, both posterior thigh wounds were closed (Figure 1). Patient B is a 9-year-old male with posterior thigh wounds that remained open following grafting of an 8% TBSA injury who received an injection of AF 10 months after injury. Following injections with AF the wounds closed over a period of 6 months (Figure 1). Patient C is a 10-year-old female with extensive contracture scarring across the upper torso, bilateral axilla and neck from a 25% TBSA injury who received an AF injection at 37 months post-injury. Areas of open wound in the axilla closed following a combination of laser treatment to scar areas and AF injections. Patient D is a 16-year-old female with 1% TBSA injury to the posterior thigh treated with split thickness skin grafting that failed to close. Following injection with AF four months after injury, the wound closed over a period of 3 months (Figure 1). VBSS scores and POSAS scores did not significantly correlate with wound healing observed. Conclusions Injection of amniotic fluid is a low-risk treatment adjunct that can be used to improve chronic burn wounds.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.320
Threshold uncertainty score0.635

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.027
GPT teacher head0.361
Teacher spread0.334 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Burn Care & ResearchSame topicReconstructive Surgery and Microvascular TechniquesFrench-language works237,207