OMUS: Efficient Opportunistic Routing in Multi-Modal Underwater Sensor Networks
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Underwater wireless sensor networks (UWSNs) have emerged as an enabling technology for aquatic monitoring. However, data delivery in UWSNs is challenging, due to the harsh aquatic environment and characteristics of the underwater acoustic channel. In recent years, underwater nodes with multi-modal communication capabilities have been proposed to create communication diversity and improve data delivery in UWSNs. Nevertheless, less attention has been devoted to the design of networking protocols leveraging multi-modal communication capabilities of underwater nodes. In this paper, we propose a novel stochastic model for the study of opportunistic routing (OR) in multi-modal UWSNs. We also design two candidate set selection heuristics, named OMUS-E and OMUS-D, for the joint selection of the most suitable acoustic modem for data transmission and next-hop forwarder candidate nodes at each hop, aimed to reduce the energy consumption and improve the network data delivery ratio in multi-modal UWSNs, respectively. Numerical results showed that both proposed heuristics reduced the energy consumption by 65%, 70%, and 75% as compared to the DBR, HydroCast, and GEDAR classical related work protocols, while maintaining a similar data delivery ratio. Furthermore, the proposed solutions outperformed the CAPTAIN routing protocol in terms of data delivery ratio, while maintaining comparable energy consumption.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".