Bibliographic record
Abstract
Since, the concept of globalization is defined as cross-cultural integration, which ultimately results in technological advancement, increase in commercialization, and increase in the foreign direct investment. The problem related to the concept of globalization and mass communication in the Islamic perspective is the hindrances in the education of Islam via the execution of conventional mass communication. Further, sustainability in the ideology of Islam is a big issue at the global level because some Islamic dominant countries have different perspectives related to the ideology of Islam. This research study incorporates the qualitative method that helps in analyzing the concept of globalization and mass communication, in the light of the Islamic perspectives. The research mainly gathers the qualitative data from the secondary sources. In the data analysis section, it strives to learn about the concept of globalization and mass communication by initiating a content analysis. This research, in particular, opts for the primary methods where data is gathered from the previous research study, case study, and news article. The data would be pertaining to the concept of globalization and mass communication in accordance with the Islam perspective. The data analysis would mainly be analyzing the literature obtained from the past research, news article and website. Mass communication comes under the umbrella of the information and communication systems and it is defined as the communication of information from an individual, large or small group of people, or a small corporation to a large group of assorted and mysterious people. Mass communication is useful for the people in the communication of Islam to guide the people about Islam and spread Islamic education to the people.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.003 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.006 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.951 | 0.958 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; the direct Gemma label and the distilled Codex classifier agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".