MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3146543414 · doi:10.1080/23754931.2021.1901237

Spatial Planning Framework for Development of Rural Activity Centers: Method of Location Allocation, Effect on Trip Length, and Policy Implications

2021· article· en· W3146543414 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePapers in Applied Geography · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban Transport and Accessibility
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsContext (archaeology)MaximizationPopulationRural areaBusinessComputer scienceTransport engineeringEnvironmental economicsOperations researchGeographyEngineeringEconomicsMicroeconomics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Activity center (AC) location allocation is a central concept for better quality of life, poverty reduction, accessibility maximization, and minimization of trip length and cost. An AC is characterized by p number of basic facilities present within it. The proposed framework identifies heuristically the potential locations of ACs that consist of multiple basic facilities. This article proposes a spatial planning framework to help policymakers while making infrastructure development decisions within budgetary limitations. For the application of this planning framework, a rural district in India is considered to allocate the location of ACs with four facilities: a health-care center, high school, bank, and market. The effect of AC developments on trip length is analyzed by preparing different activity chains to complete multiple trip purposes. Two cases are considered for location allocation of ACs. In the first case, we assumed that there is no facility existing in the study area; the latter case dealt with a situation where there are facilities already existing. In the case analysis, four categories of ACs are configured: AC4 with all four facility types, AC3 with any three facility types, AC2 with any two facility types, and AC1 with a single facility. Findings revealed that considerable trip cost savings in terms of trip length reduction could be realized from AC4 type activity centers over all other categories of AC. The policy context discussed in this article will not only help in maintaining uniformity in socioeconomic services over the region, but also, balance population density in physically isolated areas and densely populated areas. With the illustrated application, all the identified ACs with partial services within a region can be augmented to become full-fledged ACs in a phased manner, where infrastructure financing is constrained, particularly in lower and middle-income economies. In summary, the research framework will improve the quality of life in rural regions with a focus on better health, improved education, and an enhanced economy.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.457
Threshold uncertainty score0.379

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.343
Teacher spread0.325 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it