MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3146614586 · doi:10.4000/books.igpde.12442

Enjeux et difficultés de l’affirmation d’un territoire du luxe : coconception d’un modèle de cluster dédié aux savoir‑faire d’exception

2021· book-chapter· fr· W3146614586 on OpenAlexaff
Martine Hlady Rispal

Bibliographic record

VenueInstitut de la gestion publique et du développement économique eBooks · 2021
Typebook-chapter
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

L’âme du luxe réside dans l’histoire d’un territoire. Un cristal évoque Baccarat, un costume Milan, une montre la Suisse… Le produit de luxe établit une connexion immédiate entre la géographie, l’histoire, la culture d’un territoire (regional charisma en anglais) et l’ensemble des consommateurs de la planète ; ceux aux revenus élevés qui l’acquièrent pour profiter de son caractère unique en termes de qualité et/ou pour signaler une réussite sociale, et les autres qui le reconnaissent comme é...

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.004
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.062
Threshold uncertainty score0.130

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0040.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0090.037
Scholarly communication0.0120.010
Open science0.0030.005
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0090.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInstitut de la gestion publique et du développement économique eBooksSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207