Adrienne Munich and Melissa Bradshaw (eds.). Amy Lowell, American Modern. New Brunswick: Rutgers UP, 2004 [Book review]
Bibliographic record
Abstract
From the publication of her first book, <i>A Dome of Many-Coloured Glass</i> in 1912, until her death in 1925, Amy Lowell reigned as an important, influential, and well-known modernist poet. She published eleven books during her lifetime, edited three volumes of the Imagist anthology, <i>Some Imagist Poets</i>, gave numerous well-attended readings and lectures, and regularly contributed work to leading magazines such as <i>The Atlantic Monthly</i>. She also helped to fund and contributed work to a variety of literary magazines including Harriet Monroe’s Poetry. Lowell was a respected contemporary of the poets most often associated with the modernist movement, whether they supported her projects and ideas or whether, like Ezra Pound, they openly expressed their irritation and frustration. In the years just following her death, Lowell’s reputation continued to flourish with the posthumous publication of her lectures and essays in <i>Poetry and Poets </i>as well as with three additional collections of poetry, including <i>What’s O’Clock</i> which received the Pulitzer Prize in 1926. Given her importance as a poet, critic, and editor, the limited amount of critical attention she has received after 1930 and the fact that all of her books have been out of print for decades seem to be a glaring oversight on the part of scholars and publishers. The editors of and contributors to <i>Amy Lowell, American Modern</i> seek to remedy this situation by instigating a serious critical conversation about Lowell and her work as well as by bringing many of her poems back into print through a companion volume, <i>Selected Poems of Amy Lowell</i> (2003).
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.264 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".