Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry Reduces Spectral Complexity in Mass Spectrometry Based Workflow
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract In bottom-up mass spectrometry based proteomics, deep proteome coverage is limited by high cofragmentation rates. This occurs when more than one analyte is isolated by the quadrupole and the subsequent fragmentation event produces fragment ions of heterogeneous origin. One strategy to reduce cofragmentation rates is through effective peptide separation techniques such as chromatographic separation and, the more recently popularized, ion mobility (IM) spectrometry which separates peptides by their collisional cross section. Here we investigate the capability of the Trapped Ion Mobility Spectrometry (TIMS) device to effectively separate peptide ions and quantify the separation power of the TIMS device in the context of a Parallel Accumulation-Serial Fragmentation (PASEF) workflow. We found that TIMS IM separation increases the number of interference-free MS1 features 9.2-fold, while decreasing the average peptide density in precursor spectra 6.5 fold. In a Data Dependent Acquisition (DDA) PASEF workflow, IM separation increased the number of spectra without cofragmentation by a factor of 4.1 and the number of high quality spectra 17-fold. This observed decrease in spectral complexity results in a substantial increase in peptide identification rates when using our data-driven model. In the context of a Data Independent Acquisition (DIA), the reduction in spectral complexity resulting from IM separation is estimated to be equivalent to a 4-fold decrease in isolation window width (from 25Da to 6.5Da). Our study shows that TIMS IM separation dramatically reduces cofragmentation rates leading to an increase in peptide identification rates.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".