MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3146990179 · doi:10.2991/aebmr.k.210319.087

Using IS-LM Model to Analyze the Effects of Covid-19 on Chinese Economy

2021· article· en· W3146990179 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Haonan Wang

Bibliographic record

VenueAdvances in economics, business and management research/Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCOVID-19 Pandemic Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19)EconomicsInvestment (military)PandemicChinaInterest rateMonetary economicsFinancial marketEconomyEconometricsFinanceGeography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Covid-19 has affected Chinese economy greatly.Each local industries and companies are influenced by the isolation policy, and people are losing jobs.Because most industries and companies are affected, the GDP growth rate of the first quarter in 2020 have decreased a lot.After discussing how does the quarter GDP growth rate decrease detailed, the theory that coronavirus influenced Chinese economies significantly, will be proved by IS-LM model through accurate data from National Bureau of Statistics and other statistics by using formula equations.Those statistics will show the change of each element of the financial market and goods market, which are corresponding to each variable in the formula of IS-LM model.The changes in these variables give the expectation of how economy changes over time.According to the analysis in this paper, coronavirus has brought huge impact on the net export, the investment inboard and aboard, and the employment as well as salaries, leading to an overall decrease in output and the nominal interest rate.Therefore, both the goods markets and the financial markets are affected through the pandemic, corresponding to the situation in China at the first quarter of 2020.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.125
Threshold uncertainty score0.249

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.076
GPT teacher head0.383
Teacher spread0.307 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAdvances in economics, business and management research/Advances in Economics, Business and Management ResearchSame topicCOVID-19 Pandemic ImpactsFrench-language works237,207