MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3147155042 · doi:10.4271/2020-36-0208

Design of a Mono-Leaf in Sandwich Structure for Application in Light-Load Vehicle Using Finite Element Method

2021· article· en· W3147155042 on OpenAlexaff
Leonardo do Carmo Lelis Dias, Erivaldo Pereira Nunes, Marcella Cristina Neves Alvarenga, Antonio Ávila

Bibliographic record

VenueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper series · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMechanical Engineering and Vibrations Research
Canadian institutionsChrysler (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsFinite element methodStructural engineeringComputer scienceMaterials scienceEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper aims to present the design of a mono-leaf in steel/composite sandwich structure (epoxy/glass fiber). The automotive main challenges now-a-days are fuel economy and CO2 emission reduction. To achieve such goals, the usage of new materials and design optimization procedures are required. This research focuses on light-load commercial vehicles, in special, rear suspension. Leaf springs are the key components of such suspension. Therefore, the design optimization procedure developed is centered into leaf spring weight reduction. The design optimization procedure was bounded by industry regulatory standards and base on analytical and numerical experiments. Once the design phase is completed, a finite element analysis was performed using ANSYS Workbench®. The finite element analysis not only provided a detailed mapping of stress and displacement fields, but it also allowed to identify possible regions of failures. Moreover, it is possible to make a comparison among all the cases studied. The final step is the fuel economy analysis.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.290
Teacher spread0.268 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSAE technical papers on CD-ROM/SAE technical paper seriesSame topicMechanical Engineering and Vibrations ResearchFrench-language works237,207