MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3147204088 · doi:10.1109/tits.2021.3067396

Special Issue on 3D Sensing in Intelligent Transportation

2021· article· en· W3147204088 on OpenAlexaff
Chenglu Wen, Ayman Habib, Jonathan Li, Charles Toth, Cheng Wang, Hongchao Fan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicRemote Sensing and LiDAR Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeospatial analysisIntelligent transportation systemObstacleLidarComputer sciencePhotogrammetryObstacle avoidanceData processingData scienceAdvanced driver assistance systemsSystems engineeringTransport engineeringEngineeringArtificial intelligenceRemote sensingGeographyDatabase

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

High-Accuracy and high-efficiency 3-D sensing and associated data processing techniques are urgently needed for today’s roadway inventory, infrastructure health monitoring, autonomous driving, connected vehicles, urban modeling, and smart cities. 3D geospatial data acquired by digital photogrammetry or laser scanning or LiDAR systems have become one of the most critical data sources to support the above-mentioned applications. While progress has been made to applying 3D sensory data to those applications related to intelligent transportation systems (ITS), such as road network extraction, platform localization, obstacle avoidance, high-definition map generation, and transportation infrastructure inventory, many essential questions remain regarding the processing and understanding such massive 3D datasets in ITS-related applications. The authors have selected four articles for review in this Special issue. A summary of these articles is outlined below.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.232 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations15
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation SystemsSame topicRemote Sensing and LiDAR ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207