MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3147222585

O desenvolvimento econômico e as migrações: percepções sobre a política migratória do Canadá

2015· article· pt· W3147222585 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Josiane de Lima Lima

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicMigration, Racism, and Human Rights
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical sciencePhilosophy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

As migracoes internacionais – fenomeno envolvendo a mobilidade humana permanente ou semipermanente de um pais a outro – tem demonstrado um papel estrategico nas relacoes internacionais. No contexto da migracao como causa do desenvolvimento; e o desenvolvimento, por sua vez, como a principal motivacao de movimento da populacao e redistribuicao: as migracoes e o desenvolvimento economico operam com estreita sinergia. O presente trabalho visa investigar acerca desta relacao entre migracoes internacionais e desenvolvimento economico com enfoque no Canada. Considerando a continuidade e abertura de suas politicas migratorias, buscar-se-a realizar uma analise historico-comparativa do periodo de 2002 a 2012. Faz-se relevante, ainda, levantar dados estatisticos junto aos orgaos oficiais do governo canadense, a fim de atender os objetivos propostos e responder a indagacao se o intenso fluxo migratorio canadense e ou nao determinante para o desenvolvimento economico do pais.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.048
Threshold uncertainty score0.345

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0140.006
Scholarly communication0.0050.001
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.057
GPT teacher head0.336
Teacher spread0.279 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2015
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicMigration, Racism, and Human RightsFrench-language works237,207