Bibliographic record
Abstract
Kinney, Jeff. Diary of a Wimpy Kid. [Series]. New York: Amulet Books, 2007. Print.The book that I read was Diary of Wimpy Kid. The author is Jeff Kenny. The book was made in 2007 and the publisher is Amulet Books. The story is about a boy named Greg Hefley. This whole book is about his summer year. He lives with his two brothers Rodrick and Manny and his parents. This whole book is about his journal. The thing I like about this book is when Greg meets Fregly because Fregly acts weird. What I also like is when Greg goes to camp and they make farting noises. What I did not like about this book is that Jeff Kenny did not add color and it’s too easy to read. I rate this book 4 out of 5. Highly Recommended: 4 out of 5 starsReviewer: Nicholas My name is Nicholas. I love to read non-fictional books like The Guiness Book of World Records. My favorite place to read is on the bus. My favorite book is Diary of Wimpy Kid. I don’t like long chapter books.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.010 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.016 | 0.010 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".