MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3147292964 · doi:10.18280/ijsdp.160117

Adopting Spatial Analysis to Choose Suitable Villages for Rural Development: Iraq / Babylon Governorate Case Study

2021· article· en· W3147292964 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Shatha A. Hasan, Ammar Khalil Ebraheem, Mustafa Abduljalil Ibraheem

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicGlobal Trade and Competitiveness
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyRural developmentEnvironmental planningRegional scienceSocioeconomicsCivil engineeringArchaeologyEngineeringEconomicsAgriculture

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of this research is to establish criteria for selecting villages for rural development service centres by integrating statistical and tabulated data from one side with geodatabase for spatial analysis from the other.Thus, by using this to generate spatial indicators, the research would be able to create a holistic picture of the situation of all villages and to discover the real potential in them.The research methodology consisted of statistical data obtained by means of a data questionnaire for all villages and combined these statistical data with spatial data for the community of villages under review in order to produce a new generation of spatial information as indicators for decision-making.The results indicate the possibility of generalising the spatial analysis of geographic information systems as an effective basis in the studies of spatial planning at its various levels.Besides, the spatial analysis provides a realtime spatial predictor for rapid decision-making because it is based on a direct and periodic update of the spatial database.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.061
Threshold uncertainty score0.122

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.261
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Sustainable Development and PlanningSame topicGlobal Trade and CompetitivenessFrench-language works237,207