MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3147442129 · doi:10.1016/j.euf.2021.03.018

Novel Classification for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma to Better Risk-stratify Patients Eligible for Kidney-sparing Strategies: An International Collaborative Study

2021· article· en· W3147442129 on OpenAlexaff
Gautier Marcq, Beat Foerster, Mohammad Abufaraj, Surena F. Matin, Mounsif Azizi, Mohit Gupta, Wei‐Ming Li, Thomas Seisen, Timothy N. Clinton, Évanguelos Xylinas, Maria Carmen Mir, D.G. Schweitzer, Andrea Mari, Shoji Kimura, Marco Bandini, Romain Mathiéu, Ja Hyeon Ku, Georgi Guruli, Markus Grabbert, Anna Czech, Tim Muilwijk, Armin Pycha, David D’Andrea, Firas G. Petros, Philippe E. Spiess, Trinity J. Bivalacqua, Wen‐Jeng Wu, Morgan Rouprêt, Laura-Maria Krabbe, Kees Hendricksen, Shin Egawa, Alberto Briganti, Marco Moschini, V. Graffeille, Riccardo Autorino, Patricia John, Axel Heidenreich, Piotr Chłosta, Steven Joniau, Francesco Soria, Phillip M. Pierorazio, Shahrokh F. Shariat, Wassim Kassouf

Bibliographic record

VenueEuropean Urology Focus · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicBladder and Urothelial Cancer Treatments
Canadian institutionsMcGill UniversityUniversité de MontréalHôpital du Sacré-Cœur de MontréalMcGill University Health Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineInterquartile rangeOdds ratioRetrospective cohort studyUrologyConfidence intervalInternal medicineUrothelial carcinomaOncologyBladder cancerCancer

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex
No abstract in any covered source. Its absence is recorded, not treated as a negative.

No abstract. This is not a gap in this database; OpenAlex has none either. 23.3% of the frame is in this state, and the screen finds HALF as much metaresearch here, so the absence is a measured bias rather than a missing field.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.028
Threshold uncertainty score0.963

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.288 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations25
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractno

Explore more

Same venueEuropean Urology FocusSame topicBladder and Urothelial Cancer TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207