Hypnosis in 53 Children With Anxiety Disorders, Nocturnal Enuresis, or Insomnia
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Background: We present results of a prospective long-term study of 53 children treated consecutively with hypnotherapy. Study Design: Children were treated for anxiety, nocturnal enuresis, or insomnia. Long-term (mean of 25.4 months) follow-up was performed. Results: Of the 20 children with anxiety disorder, 55% had good-to-excellent long-term results, rating a 4 (good) to 5 (excellent) on a scale of 1 to 5. Seventeen children were treated for nocturnal enuresis and 59% had good/excellent rating for long-term results. The 16 children with insomnia had long-term good/excellent long-term effectiveness of 37.5%. No parent or child reported any adverse effect. Conclusion: In this pilot study, hypnotherapy was performed by a professionally trained nurse practitioner. The use of hypnosis was safe and moderately helpful, particularly for anxiety disorder or nocturnal enuresis. Although results of this pilot study showed modest effectiveness, fair to poor re-visit compliance and poor compliance with at-home, self-hypnosis practice, reduced the ability to effectively rate our implementation of this treatment modality. Int J Clin Pediatr. 2013;2(2):61-67 doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.4021/ijcp104w
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".