MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3147918888 · doi:10.34225/jidc.2010.1.12

OECD/DAC 젠더넷의 역할과 활동 현황

2010· article· ko· W3147918888 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of International Development Cooperation · 2010
Typearticle
Languageko
FieldComputer Science
TopicTechnology and Data Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersInternational Development Research Centre
KeywordsPolitical science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

이 글은 OECD의 국제개발협력을 전담하고 있는 개발원조위원회(Development Assistance Committee:이하 OECD/DAC) 산하의 8개 주제별 작업반의 하나로, 성 평등과 여성역량강화 활동 을 전담하고 있는 젠더네트워크(DAC Network on Gender: GenderNet, 이하 젠더넷)의 역할과 활동내용을 소개하는 데 그 목적이 있다. 이는 올해 1월 1일부터 우리나라가 OECD/DAC의 회원국 으로 활동하게 됨에 따라, 국제사회의 개발협력에 대한 주제영역별 이슈들과 모범사례 및 교훈들을 우리의 ODA 정책과 실천과정에 적용하기 위한 탐구 노력의 일환이라 할 수 있다.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.685
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.241 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it