MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3147928915

Identification and Molecular Mapping of the Powdery Mildew Resistance Gene in Wheat Cultivar Yumai 66

2008· article· en· W3147928915 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Hu Tie

Bibliographic record

VenueACTA AGRONOMICA SINICA · 2008
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicWheat and Barley Genetics and Pathology
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBlumeria graminisPowdery mildewBiologyCultivarCommon wheatChromosomePlant disease resistanceTriticaleGenetic analysisGeneticsGeneHorticultureAgronomy
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Powdery mildew,caused by Blumeria graminis f.sp.tritici,is one of the most important diseases of wheat(Triticum aestivum L.)worldwide.Breeding for resistance is the most economical and effective method for controlling the disease.Yumai 66,a common wheat cultivar derived from a wheat-triticale cross,is resistant to a wide spectrum of wheat powdery mildew isolates from both China and Canada.In the present study,genetic analysis indicated that Yumai 66 carried a single dominant gene for resistance to powdery mildew,designated tentatively PmYm66.The segregating F2 populations and their F3 progenies of the crosses Yumai 66/Mingxian 169 and Yumai 66/ND3509 were used for bulked segregation analysis (BSA).Four molecular markers were associated with PmYm66 in an order of EST48–EST83 (EST84)–Xksum193–PmYm66.These SSR and EST markers were assigned to the distal bin of chromosome 2AL by means of Chinese Spring nullisomic-tetrasomic,ditelisomic,and deletion lines.The reaction types of Yumai 66 to 21 B.graminis f.sp.tritici isolates from China was different from that of Pm4a and Pm4b located on chromosome 2AL.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.872
Threshold uncertainty score0.140

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.206
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueACTA AGRONOMICA SINICASame topicWheat and Barley Genetics and PathologyFrench-language works237,207